Success Stories

In February 2025, our office successfully assisted a client in obtaining their H-1B visa from the U.S. Consulate in Hyderabad, India. Our client was forced to leave the U.S. and apply for an H-1B visa due to the denial of their H-1B extension. In the denial, USCIS claimed that our client made false statements and failed to maintain their status while on OPT with Apex IT Systems Inc. ("Apex IT"). As an F-1 visa international student, our client participated in the OPT program and was hired by Apex IT. Unbeknownst to our client, a USCIS investigation later revealed that Apex IT was a fraudulent organization. In response, USCIS has relentlessly pursued former students associated with Apex IT, issuing Requests for Evidence ("RFE") and Notices of Intent to Deny ("NOID") alleging misrepresentation and fraud. Notably, in some RFEs and NOIDs, USCIS asserted that former students should have known that Apex IT's address was a Mexican restaurant in a strip mall. USCIS faulted the students for failing to recognize this and denied many of their STEM OPT or H-1B applications. While our client was still in the U.S., their employer timely filed for their H-1B extension. USCIS then issued a NOID alleging that our client had committed misrepresentation and fraud and had failed to maintain status during their F-1 OPT period. Our client’s employer’s immigration counsel assisted them in responding to the NOID. However, USCIS denied the extension application, forcing our client to return to India to apply for an H-1B visa stamp. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on representation to assist the client with the visa application process. We conducted multiple mock interviews to ensure the client was well-prepared. Our office also prepared a legal brief, the client’s statement, and supporting documents to firmly establish that our client had not made any misrepresentations to the U.S. government regarding their past OPT employment. Furthermore, the record clearly demonstrated that our client had maintained valid status during their F-1 OPT period and, therefore, should not be found inadmissible. We are pleased to report that one week after our client’s consular interview, their H-1B visa was approved, and they are now on their way back to the U.S. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, XCG Design Corp, or Apex IT Systems Inc. in any capacity, it is crucial to consult with an experienced immigration attorney immediately. Early consultation can help identify potential issues in your case and develop a strong strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Related Success Stories on Apex IT: Successfully Obtained STEM OPT For Student That Was Previously Associated With Apex IT Systems Inc.(Oct 2024) Successfully Assisted a Client Who Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies Inc. to Obtain H-1B Visa from US Consulate in India ( November 2023) Successfully Assisted a Client Who Was Previously Associated with Andwill to Obtain H-1B Visa from US Consulate in India Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022) Successfully Overcome H-1B RFE for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (April 2023) Successfully Overcome H-1B Extension NOID for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (June 2023) Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after THREE previous H-1B denials (August 2023) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (Dec 2022)

In June 2024, our office represented a client in overcoming allegations of misrepresentation and fraud related to their association with Smoothies Technology Inc. As an F-1 visa holder, a foreign student is permitted to study in the United States. F-1 visa holders are eligible to extend their stay through Optional Practical Training (OPT), a program that allows students to obtain temporary employment in their field of study. Unbeknownst to many F-1 international students, FINDREAM founder Weiyun “Kelly” Huang and the corporations she established were convicted of conspiracy to commit visa fraud in 2020. Huang used deceptive means to lure students into paying for her services in exchange for securing temporary employment to fulfill OPT requirements. FINDREAM falsely promised training services, networking opportunities, and internships that appeared to be legitimate employment opportunities. Many F-1 students fell victim to the fraud perpetrated by Huang and her accomplices. Following the convictions of the perpetrators, USCIS has relentlessly pursued student victims of this fraud as “knowing co-conspirators” if they were previously employed by FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading Inc., Andwil LLC, Wireclass, New Beast, Smoothies Technology Inc., and ApexIT Technologies Inc. After our client’s F-1 OPT period ended, they returned to their home country for nearly a decade. In 2024, when they applied for an immigrant visa, they initially underwent a routine immigrant visa interview at the U.S. Consulate. However, they later received an email from the Fraud Prevention Unit requesting a secondary interview. During the secondary interview, the client was subjected to multiple interrogations and ultimately faced the denial of their immigration petition. The Fraud Prevention Unit officer accused our client of being a co-conspirator with Smoothies Technology Inc. and expressed disbelief in their testimony. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on the case to assist the client in overcoming the misrepresentation allegations. We strategically guided them in rebutting the willful misrepresentation and fraud allegations made by USCIS. The evidence we presented sufficiently demonstrated that the client had not made false representations to obtain a benefit under U.S. immigration laws. Even if any false statement had been made, it was neither willful nor material, thereby overcoming all allegations. A finding of misrepresentation or fraud has severe immigration consequences. It can render a non-citizen inadmissible for life, potentially imposing a permanent bar to obtaining permanent residency unless USCIS grants a waiver at its discretion. Our firm is pleased to share that after the secondary interview, our client was scheduled for a third interview, during which their immigrant visa was approved and issued.  If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, XCG Design Corp, Andwil LLC, Wireclass, Codersdata LLC, New Beast, Smoothies Technology Inc., or GlobalITExperts in any manner or capacity, it is crucial to consult with an experienced immigration attorney. Professional legal guidance can help identify potential issues early and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Our office has became aware that in many instances, F-1, H-1B visa holders or even green card holders, most from India and China, are being refused admission at the U.S. port of entry, issued Notice of Intent to Deny or Request for Evidence, interviewed by USCIS Fraud Detection Officers, subjected to expedited removal orders, and finding of inadmissibility for misrepresentation and fraud, if they previously held work authorization by association with above companies. Latest Success Stories on Findream: Successfully Obtained I-485 Approval for Client That Failed to Recall Past Employment with Findream During I-485 Interview ( October 2023) Successfully Obtained H1B Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM Successfully Overcame NOID, Re-obtained H4 Status, and Green Card for Client That Was Previously Associated with SINOCONTECH Successfully Overcame RFE and Obtained H1B Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM ( Sept 2021) Successfully Obtained H-1B Visa and Green Card for Client That Was Previously Associated with DEALFAR ( Jan 2022) Success Story: Overcame NOID and Obtained H4 Status Extension for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM (January 2022) Successfully Obtained O-1 Visa for Client That Was Previously Associated with ARECY LLC (MAY 2022) Successfully Responded to RFE and Obtained H-1B Extension for Client That Was Previously Associated with Masswell and CG Max Design ( September 2022) Successfully Obtained THREE I-485 Approvals for Clients That Were Previously Associated with FINDREAM Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (December 2022) Successfully Obtained I-485 Approval for Client That Was Previously Associated with CloudParticle (March 2023)

In October 2024, our office successfully overcame a very difficult Notice of Intent to Deny ("NOID") of I-485 Application to Adjust Status for a client who was previously associated with Tellon Trading, LLC (“Tellon Trading”). As an F1 visa international students, our client participated in OPT program and was hired by Tellon Trading as an intern. Our client was promised an exciting internship with accommodating remote work arrangement. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to our client, Tellon Trading was flagged by the news as part of a scheme to deceive students, particularly Chinese students, looking for employment or internships to maintain their F-1 OPT status. Questionable companies like Findream used elaborate means to reel students into their schemes. These companies often advertise themselves as a valid and legal entity with valuable connections to prestigious employers and companies. Tellon Trading was flagged by NBC Bay Area’s investigation along with five other companies that hired employees through the OPT program, including Abroad Intellect Capital, Acuty, Findream, Smoothies Technology and New Beast with possible abuse of the OPT program. After convictions of Kelly Huang, the perpetrator of FINDREAM fraudulent scheme, USCIS and State Department have relentlessly pursued the student victims of fraud as “knowing co-conspirators.” USCIS has issued Request for Evidence, Notice of Intent to Deny, interviews by USCIS Fraud Detection Officers, alleging misrepresentation and fraud, if the student previously held work authorization by association with above companies. Our client was applying for their employment based green card through their employer. During the I-485 interview, they were questioned extensively regarding their internship with Tellon Trading. Our client was subsequently issued a NOID for their association with Tellon Trading. USCIS accused our client of failure to maintain continuous status and misrepresentation, which renders our client's ineligible for adjustment of status. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on representation to assist our client addressing any potential allegations of misrepresentation and fraud stemming from her association with Tellon Trading. The evidence presented sufficiently supported a finding that the client did not make false representations to procure a benefit under U.S. immigration laws. Furthermore, our client did not have a break in continuous status, and even if they did, our client is eligible for INA 245(k) waiver. The firm is very pleased to learn that our client's green card was issued less than 12 weeks after we submitted our response. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, and Tellon Trading, Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, XCG Design Corp in any manner or capacity, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to immediately advise you and to identify potential problems early in your case and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Related Stories: Finding Your Way Out of FINDREAM and SINOCONTECH FRAUD Allegations Successfully Overcame NOID and Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM Successfully Overcame RFE and Obtained H1B Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM ( Sept 2021) Success Story: Overcame NOID and Obtained H4 Status Extension for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM (January 2022) Successfully Obtained O-1 Visa for Client That Was Previously Associated with ARECY LLC (MAY 2022) Successfully Responded to RFE and Obtained H-1B Extension for Client That Was Previously Associated with Masswell and CG Max Design ( September 2022) Successfully Obtained THREE I-485 Approvals for Clients That Were Previously Associated with FINDREAM Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (December 2022) Successfully Obtained I-485 Approval for Client That Was Previously Associated with CloudParticle (March 2023) Successfully Re-obtained H-1B Visa for Client That Was Previously Associated with DEALFAR ( Oct 2022)

Successfully Obtained STEM OPT For Student That Was Previously Associated With Apex IT Systems Inc.(Oct 2024)

In a March 2024 decision, the USCIS San Jose Field Office reversed its previous denials of our client's I-130 US Citizen's Petition for Spouse and I-485 Green Card Application as a result of our lawsuit in federal court, Northern District of California. Our client, a U.S. Citizen (USC), filed an I-130 spousal petition on behalf of his wife, a citizen of Kenya. The non-US citizen spouse (Beneficiary) simultaneously filed a Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (the “I-485 application”), to become a Legal Permanent Resident. Because the Beneficiary stated in previous immigration filings, such as the B1/B2 tourist visa and asylum application, that she was “married” to the father of her children in Kenya, USCIS issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) regarding the termination of the marriage. In response to the RFE, our clients provided evidence that the Beneficiary was never legally married in Kenya and that cohabitation is not considered a legal marriage in either Kenya or California, where the marriage with the USC spouse was celebrated. However, USCIS denied the I-130 petition and the I-485 application, finding that our client was not eligible for an immediate relative visa because they failed to prove that the Beneficiary was never married before. Our clients filed a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, asking USCIS to reopen or reconsider the I-130 Denial (“I-290B MTR”) based on extensive evidence and legal arguments that the Beneficiary was never legally married to the father of her children under Kenyan law. Nevertheless, USCIS denied the I-290B MTR (“I-290B Denial”), asserting that only evidence from the “Registrar General” of Kenya had legal authority to establish that the Beneficiary “had never been married in all of Kenya.” Despite submitting all relevant case law, accompanying memoranda of points and authorities, and supporting documentation on the issue of the validity of the Beneficiary's marital status, USCIS remained unresponsive to the record and legal authorities as submitted. The I-290B Denial refused to grant any weight to the additional evidence that our clients submitted. Our clients were faced with the options to refile their case or submit an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Both options would entail extremely long processing times with no clear resolution. The clients were then referred to our office for an evaluation. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu devised an aggressive litigation strategy to immediately advance our client's case in federal court to seek timely adjudication of the matter. We filed a lawsuit on behalf of our clients in federal court against USCIS, challenging its wrongful decision to deny our clients' I-130 and I-485 petitions. Within 60 days after filing the lawsuit, an US Attorney from US Department of Justice headquarter in Washington D.C. informed our office that the USCIS San Jose Field Office had reopened the I-130 and I-485 petitions, and approved our client's green card. The government did not even file an opposition or a response to our lawsuit. The firm is extremely pleased with the complete victory of our federal lawsuit. Our client has received her green card and safely remained with her husband in the U.S. When facing wrongful denials by USCIS, holding the government accountable in the federal court has proven to empower families, individuals, and businesses. Our firm has found it to be the most effective approach in getting immigration cases adjudicated or reverse a wrongful denied decision.

In April 2024, our office successfully sued U.S. Department of State ("DOS") in federal court, forcing DOS to completely reverse course, and approved our client's H-4 visa application. As an F-1 visa international student, our client participated in the OPT program and was hired by Integra. Unbeknownst to the client, Integra appeared to be a possible shell company. Integra used elaborate means to entice mostly Indian students to pay for training in exchange for obtaining temporary employment to fulfill the requirements of F-1 OPT. Integra allegedly promised to provide training services, networking opportunities, and internships perceived to be legitimate employment opportunities. Many F-1 students relied on Integra's promises and received job offers from Integra. After NBC Bay Area's investigation exposed Integra's questionable nature, USCIS and DOS have relentlessly pursued the former students that were previously associated with Integra. USCIS has issued Request for Evidence, Notice of Intent to Deny ("NOID"), interviews by USCIS Fraud Detection Officers, alleging misrepresentation and fraud. Many of the students and former students also received revocation of F-1 visa and H-1B visa from DOS. In 2020, our client received a terrible shock when two DHS officers knocked on the door of their home in Seattle, Washington. The officers asked our client if they had ever been associated with a company called Aztech and told them to make themselves available for an interview. Our client had never heard of such a company. After the officers left, our client researched the company name, discovering that Aztech was associated with Integra, and both companies were under investigation for visa fraud. Our client later left the U.S. and relocated to Canada for a job. However, their spouse remains in the U.S. as a H-1B visa holder. Having been forced to maintain separate households in separate countries for three years, our client sought our office's assistance with their H-4 visa application be united with their spouse in the U.S. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on representation to assist our clients. Our office filed a new H-4 application for our client and submitted 145 pages of supplemental information to firmly establish that our client did not make any misrepresentation to the U.S. government regarding their past OPT employment and they should not be found inadmissible. Our client then attended an interview at the U.S. Consulate and provided a packet of supporting documents. Following the interview, our client received a telephone call from the consular officer, informing them that their visa would be denied and no waiver was recommended. The Consulate provided no further explanation for its decision, nor did it reveal the grounds for refusing to recommend a waiver of inadmissibility. Due to the imminent harm to our clients, our firm took an aggressive approach to protect our client's rights. We filed a lawsuit against DOS in federal court, Seattle, Washington state. The firm is very pleased to learn that as a result of our lawsuit, DOS has completely reversed course and approved our client H-4 visa application. Our client has recently returned to the U.S. safely. We're extremely pleased that we have reached a complete victory for our clients. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, and Tellon Trading, Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, XCG Design Corp, ApexIT in any manner or capacity, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to immediately advise you and to identify potential problems early in your case and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Related Success Stories on Integra: Successfully Assisted a Client Who Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies Inc. to Obtain H-1B Visa from US Consulate in India ( November 2023) Successfully Assisted a Client Who Was Previously Associated with Andwill to Obtain H-1B Visa from US Consulate in India Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022) Successfully Overcome H-1B RFE for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (April 2023) Successfully Overcome H-1B Extension NOID for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (June 2023) Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after THREE previous H-1B denials (August 2023) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (Dec 2022)

In a September 2022 decision, San Francisco Immigration Court granted our client’s Motion to Reopen and Terminate Removal Proceeding because our client is no longer removable due to the vacate and reduction of our client's criminal convictions. Department of Homeland Security filed a lengthy 20 pages opposition to our motion. However, the immigration judge ruled on our favor. Our client is a permanent resident. Unfortunately, he had a difficult youth. As a young adult, he made a series of mistakes that led to two criminal convictions. The first was a burglary conviction when he was 18 (Cal. Pen. Code § 460). This led to a deportation order against him in immigration court. In 2006, when he was involved in a tragedy. He was unfortunately at the scene when an acquaintance of his hurt someone, resulting in that person losing his life. Our client did not participate in this act of violence or even in the planning of it, he just happened to be in the same car. On the advice of his public defender at the time, he accepted a plea deal and pled no contest to conspiracy and accessory after the fact along with sentence enhancements (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 32, 182(a)(1), 667(b)-(i)/1170.12). At the time, no one advised our client of the immigration consequences of pleading no contest to those charges. Had he known that the plea could endanger his immigration status and potentially bar him from becoming a U.S. citizen, he never would have entered the plea. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu took on representation and determined that the best approach to regain our client's permanent residency and perhaps naturalization is by Post Conviction Relief under California state law. Our office approached the Santa Clara District Attorney Office and filed a motion in the criminal court pursuant to Pen. Code, §§ 1473.7 to vacate the client’s convictions due to substantial and procedural defect of client’s criminal proceedings. Fortunately, we were able to come to an agreement with the District Attorney office and entered into a Stipulation and Order where the Santa Clara County Superior Court issued an order, legally invalidated our client's conspiracy conviction and the enhancements, because the failure to warn our client of the immigration consequences of his criminal plea is procedural defect in the criminal proceeding, violated his constitutional right, and prejudiced his ability to “meaningfully understand, defend against, or knowingly accept the . . . adverse immigration consequences” of the conviction. Cal. Pen. Code § 1473.7. Thus, his conspiracy and enhancement convictions were vacated, and he pled guilty instead to a second count of accessory after the fact (Cal. Pen. Code § 32). Following the court’s order, his 2006 conviction was converted to two counts of misdemeanor accessory after the fact (Cal. Pen. Code § 32) with a combined total sentence of 364 days. The Santa Clara Superior Court also found that our client had successfully completed his probation and paid all fines and fees; accordingly, the sentence was deemed served and his probation was terminated. Following the Santa Clara Superior Court’s order, our office successfully moved the Immigration Court to terminate removal proceedings against him despite the government's fierce objection. His successful motion to reopen and terminate removal proceedings was based on two grounds: (1) legal changes rendered his 2003 burglary conviction a non-deportable offense; and (2) following the Santa Clara Superior Court’s orders, the 2006 convictions are not deportable offenses either. Under these circumstances, “material change[s]” in the law or fact underlying the removability grounds warranted termination of the removal proceedings. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(v). Because our client's remaining conviction are neither inadmissible or deportable, in terminating removal, the Immigration Court removed the final barrier to our client's naturalization. The firm is extremely please of the result we were able to achieve for our client. Our client's naturalization application is now pending.

Finding Your Way Out of the Walter Jay M.D. Institute Scam

In February 2024, our office successfully sued USCIS in federal court, forcing USCIS to completely reverse course and approve our client's I-485 Application to Adjust Status. Our client is the principal beneficiary of an approved employment-based petition. At the I-485 Adjustment of Status interview, our client was found inadmissible because he was previously a member of the Chinese Communist Party. USCIS issued a Request for Evidence requesting an I-601 Waiver to waive their inadmissibility. The client reached out to our office for assistance. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu reviewed our client’s case file and the factual circumstances surrounding their membership in the Communist Party. Attorney Nguyen Luu determined that our client is qualified for the exceptions enumerated in the Immigration and Nationality Act. Our office prepared a substantive memorandum of law and extensive supporting documents to establish that our client is qualified for the exceptions, and therefore should not have been found inadmissible. However, even if they were found to be inadmissible - a point we did not concede - our client is still eligible for a green card because they would be eligible for the I-601 Waiver. We submitted a response to USCIS, and out of an abundance of caution, we also filed an I-601 Waiver application. Unfortunately, USCIS denied both the I-601 Waiver and the I-485 application. USCIS' denial was clearly erroneous and arbitrary because it was based on incorrect legal standards. Specifically, USCIS claimed that our client did not demonstrate sufficient extreme hardship to their LPR spouse for the I-601 Waiver. Furthermore, USCIS improperly gave less weight to a properly issued confirmation of Party membership termination. The evidence presented sufficiently supported a finding that USCIS’s misapplication of the law was the sole basis of the Denial. This was a material error of law. The Denial completely ignored basic legal concepts regarding the level of hardship required for an I-601 Waiver application. It is well-settled law that extreme hardship is not required in this context. By making such an obvious contradiction of the black letter law in the Denial, USCIS violated its duty under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to engage in “reasoned decision-making.” ( Michigan v. EPA , 576 U.S. 743, 750 (2015); 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq.) Under the APA, USCIS must refrain from making decisions that are “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.” (5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), emphasis added.) Furthermore, by not giving full weight to the evidence on the record, USCIS’s Decision on its face was “patently unresponsive” to the administrative record. Due to the imminent harm to our clients, our firm took an aggressive approach to protect their rights. We filed a lawsuit against USCIS in federal court, the Southern District of New York. Notably, this was the same court that previously found it would not have jurisdiction to hear challenges of the I-485 applications. Regardless, as one district judge's decision was not binding, we presented compelling arguments in favor of the court's jurisdiction in our lawsuit. The firm is very pleased to learn that as a result of our action, USCIS completely reversed course, re-opened, and approved our client's I-485 application. As USCIS conceded that our client was not inadmissible as they qualified for the exceptions, USCIS did not even reopen the I-601 Waiver. As we emerge completely victorious in this litigation, we are reminded that when the government fails to apply the correct law or follow its own regulations, it will be held accountable in the court of law. Our firm will not hesitate to take aggressive action in federal courts to hold the government to the highest standard. See our successes: Obtained Immigrant Visa for Past Member of Communist Party Without Filing I-601 Waiver (July 2020) I-601 Waiver of Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved within 7 weeks (March 2020) USCIS Request for an I-601 Waiver of Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Withdrawn Without Filing I-290B form- Client Received Green Card (June 2019) Success Story: I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved (Oct 2020) Obtained Green Card for Past Member of Communist Party Without Filing an I-601 Waiver Application (March 2021) Can I-601 Waiver be Granted on the Basis of "Public Interest" Alone? Yes, it could. (April 2021) Success Story: I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved within 3 weeks (November 2021) Success Story: I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved within 3 days (May 2022) Policy Alert: USCIS Issues Policy Guidance Regarding Inadmissibility Based on Membership in a Totalitarian Party (October 2nd, 2020)